Monday, February 17, 2014
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
Monday, January 20, 2014
See 1st screen shot. Alan Henness (co-founder of the Nightingale Collaboration in the UK) and one of his followers is branching out beyond just policing homeopaths and homeopathic supporters. Now the author of an article titled “Watercress is Good For You” (originally published in Cook magazine) has crossed his police scanner.
Why Watercress is Good For You.
In my opinion, through Twitter Alan Henness has taken it upon himself to put this author on his form of witness stand to defend herself about something that was not mentioned in the article itself as her own opinion, saying only that studies have shown anti-cancer effects of watercress. Notice that Alan Henness demands that she provide him with links to these studies! Note that in the comments section “gimpyblog” on 1/10/1014 at 8:45 a.m. also wants her to supply links to the studies. Where can someone report YOU, Alan? (See 2nd screen shot).
Thursday, January 9, 2014
Home Page |
Why Fight 4 Homeopathy? |
Current Articles / Debates |
Closed Articles / Debates | Enemies of Homeopathy | Detractors Say |
Supporters' Talking Points | Resources | Personal Attacks Against Me | Get Involved |
The evidence of cyber-bullying, in my opinion, by the followers of the Nightingale Collaboration just keeps growing. Why, in the name of decency, is this condoned by any of the organizations that regulate homeopathy in the UK, or anywhere for that matter? If you have a few minutes, I recommend to all my readers that they read the entir page, the comments are disgusting. Do the skeptics think that a homeopathy supporter or homeopath for that matter is not a human being? Read the entire page, if you dare HERE
The message in the image below was left in one of my blog page comment sections by the wife of Alan Henness, the co-founder of the Nightingale Collaboration. I first thought to delete it, but decided it would be better to use it to demonstrate my point that the Nightingale Collaboration followers are keen on, in my opinion, cyber-bullying.
If you think I'm done exposing the followers of the Nightingale Collaboration and what I feel is their cyber-bullying of homeopathy supporters and homeopaths, you would be wrong. I'm not finished yet.
Tuesday, January 7, 2014
Friday, December 27, 2013
Mr. Grant LaFleche took on naturopaths and homeopaths in his recent opinion piece in The Standard on 12/22/13. http://www.wellandtribune.ca/2013/12/22/ill-stick-to-muggle-science-thanks
Fortunately, he has no influence and his opinions are just that. A typical skeptic always demands reproducible studies and their belief in science based medicine as the gold standard. What’s wrong with this? Answer below:
“Too many of the findings that fill the academic either are the result of shoddy experiments or poor analysis (link to article below). A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated. Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 “landmark” studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist frets that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are bunk. In 2000-10 roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later retracted because of mistakes or improprieties.”
How Science Goes Wrong
This is what the people who are against homeopathy are fighting to maintain:
70% of Americans on Prescription Drugs
This is what homeopaths and their patients are fighting to maintain:
Much exciting collaborative research on the effectiveness of homeopathy is being done world-wide and now in collaboration with research institutions in the United States.
“The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston – The US department of alternative medicine followed the cases presented in Corfu with lab trials using Banerji’s homeopathic medicine on cancer cells at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) in Houston. Dr. Sen Pathak, Prof. of Cell Biology & Genetics, at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, collaborated in this joint research between the PBHRF and the MDACC. The research work is now complete and published. An in vitro study with the medicines has shown brilliant results in killing brain cancer cells while activating the normal cells. The paper entitled “Ruta 6 selectively induces cell death in brain cancer cells but proliferation in normal peripheral blood lymphocytes: A novel treatment for human brain cancer” was jointly published with Pathak S, Multani AS, of the Department of Molecular Genetics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA., in the October 2003 issue of the International Journal of Oncology. (PBHRF and the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA conducted jointly an in vitro research study on the effectiveness of the medicines Ruta 6 and Calcarea Phosphorica 3X in destroying brain cancer cells while activating the normal cells. The research study was published in the form of a paper in the October 2003 issue of the International Journal of Oncology.)”
Worldwide Collaborative Research on Effective Cancer Treatment Protocol
Thursday, December 26, 2013
John's response to Hentrick on 12/23/13 at 1:23 p.m. is a winner!